What’s New in Room Decontamination in the Intensive Care Unit?

Authors

  • C. Blazejewski CHRU de Lille
  • F. Wallet Université Lille-Nord-de-France
  • S. Nseir CHRU de Lille

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-014-0884-y

Keywords:

COPD, Exacerbation, Corticosteroid, Antibiotic, Ventilation, Intensive care unit

Abstract

The environment plays a central role in the transmission of hospital-acquired pathogens. Current cleaning methods are microbiologically ineffective. Improvements in environmental cleaning are associated with a decrease in the rate of hospital-acquired infections. To improve terminal cleaning, automated room disinfection systems containing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are more and more considered. Two technologies are available: aerosolization and vaporization. Dry-H2O2 vaporization is microbiologically efficient (in vitro and in situ). Its use is associated with endemic colonization and outbreak control. H2O2 aerosolization effectiveness is still in assessment. Evidence is lacking to recommend others technologies (ultraviolet, ozone, chlorine dioxide, steam, high-efficiency particulate air-filtration, ultra microfiber, copper-based biocide). All methods are associated with extra-cost and longer waiting-time between two admissions. Safety for healthcare workers is not proved.

Published

2014-03-27

How to Cite

Blazejewski, C., Wallet, F., & Nseir, S. (2014). What’s New in Room Decontamination in the Intensive Care Unit?. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 23(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-014-0884-y