Emergency Intubation

Authors

  • F. Lapostolle Samu 93, UFR recherche-enseignement-qualité, université Paris-XIII, Sorbonne
  • M. Galinski Samu 93, UFR recherche-enseignement-qualité, université Paris-XIII, Sorbonne
  • F. Adnet Samu 93, UFR recherche-enseignement-qualité, université Paris-XIII, Sorbonne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1027-9

Abstract

Tracheal intubation in emergency is associated with a higher incidence of difficulties, resulting in increased incidence of complications and mortality. The search for criteria predicting difficult intubation is more difficult and less relevant. The use of alternatives to tracheal intubation, such as optimization of the procedure, and use of specific procedures limit the onset and consequences of a difficult intubation. The choice of material, a good organization, and a proven training allow reducing the consequences of a case of difficult intubation, scheduled or not. The new “videoscopic” devices seem to be superior to conventional intubation techniques, especially in case of difficult intubation. They will probably have a good position in the next guidelines for difficult intubation in emergency or, more generally, for emergency intubation. Each structure potentially facing emergency intubation should question her choice of material and its strategy.

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Lapostolle, F., Galinski, M., & Adnet, F. (2015). Emergency Intubation. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 24(Suppl. 2), S413-S419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1027-9