Which neurologic assessment in neurocritical care?

Authors

  • Emma Izquierdo Service de réanimation neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 BRON Cedex
  • Elodie Catesson Service de réanimation neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 BRON Cedex
  • Florent Gobert Service de réanimation neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 BRON Cedex
  • Frédéric Dailler Service de réanimation neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 BRON Cedex
  • Thomas Ritzenthaler Service de réanimation neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon ; 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 BRON Cedex

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37051/mir-00196

Keywords:

Neurologic examination, Glasgow coma scale, Neurocritical care

Abstract

In neurocritical care, neurologic clinic assessment is the best way to look after patients and use several scales and scores. These tools are numerous and varied. However, their use is not always relevant and can be deleterious for the patient (overstimulation, discomfort, pain). We look for the adaptation of the neurological evaluation and aims at keeping the best sensitivity while limiting the sources of discomfort for the patient.

First, in order to evaluate the practices of other units, a survey was carried out in several neurocritical care units. The questionnaire included 2 parts: the first one on the habits of the service (scales used, frequency of scoring), the second one on identified clinical situations (conscious patient, sedated patient, confused patient...).

It appears that the Glasgow coma scale remains the most used neurological rating scale, despite its limitations and constraints with respect to the patient. Moreover, there does not seem to be any adaptation of the choice of scoring tool and frequency to the patient's pathology and clinical condition.

Image

Published

2024-02-06

How to Cite

Izquierdo, E., Catesson, E., Gobert, F., Dailler, F., & Ritzenthaler, T. (2024). Which neurologic assessment in neurocritical care? . Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 33(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.37051/mir-00196

Most read articles by the same author(s)