Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Refractory Cardiac Arrest

Authors

  • J. Brunet Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Caen CS 30001
  • X. Valette Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Caen CS 30001
  • C. Daubin Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Caen CS 30001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3166/rea-2018-0017

Abstract

The benefit of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the management of refractory cardiac arrest remains unclear. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an update in this field. The effect of ECPR on survival and neurological outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin could be very limited. In contrast, the ECPR could be more effective than conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in selected patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin or related to drug overdose. The benefit of ECPR is more contrasted in patients with refractory cardiac arrest associated with deep hypothermia following accidental exposure, a drowning or an avalanche. Further studies are still needed to clarify patients with refractory cardiac arrest who are the most likely ones to get benefited from ECPR.

Published

2018-03-01

How to Cite

Brunet, J., Valette, X., & Daubin, C. (2018). Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Refractory Cardiac Arrest. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 27(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.3166/rea-2018-0017