Socioeconomic Deprivation and Critical Care: Epidemiology and Prognosis

Authors

  • N. Bigé Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris
  • J.-L. Baudel Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris
  • A. Caron Service social hospitalier, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris
  • C. Pichereau Faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, UPMC université Paris-VI, Sorbonne Universités
  • S. Bourcier Faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, UPMC université Paris-VI, Sorbonne Universités
  • V. Dubée Faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, UPMC université Paris-VI, Sorbonne Universités
  • A. Galbois Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris
  • H. Ait-Oufella Inserm U970, centre de recherche cardiovasculaire de Paris (PARCC)
  • E. Maury UMR_S 1136, UPMC université Paris-VI, Sorbonne Universités
  • B. Guidet UMR_S 1136, UPMC université Paris-VI, Sorbonne Universités

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1080-4

Keywords:

Cardiovascular monitoring, Cardiac output, Thermodilution, Shock

Abstract

Over the last thirty years, socioeconomic inequalities in health were reinforced. Socioeconomic deprivation affects access to primary care, increases emergency visits, and is associated with more severe diseases and decreased life expectancy. Also, socioeconomic deprivation might influence epidemiology and prognosis of critically ill patients. Data of the literature, mostly based on retrospective studies, show that uninsured patients, homeless patients and those with low socioeconomic status are younger, more likely to be admitted to intensive care unit, more often admitted for medical reason and surgical emergency than for elective surgery and present with different pathologies. While several American studies found that uninsured critically ill patients are less likely to receive invasive procedures, surgery or post-acute care and more likely to die in ICU or in hospital, most European studies show that socioeconomic status is neither associated with level of care nor with mortality. Moreover, most precarious patients have increased length of stay. However, in homeless subgroup, patients living in street experience higher hospital mortality than sheltered patients. As socioeconomic deprivation definition is complex, a prospective study would be helpful to confirm these results and determine if some of its characteristics are associated with prognosis of critically ill patients. Finally, social isolation raises the question of advance directives including living wills and durable powers of attorney.

Published

2015-06-13

How to Cite

Bigé, N., Baudel, J.-L., Caron, A., Pichereau, C., Bourcier, S., Dubée, V., Galbois, A., Ait-Oufella, H., Maury, E., & Guidet, B. (2015). Socioeconomic Deprivation and Critical Care: Epidemiology and Prognosis. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 24(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1080-4

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2