PCO2 gradients: a reliable marker of macro- and microcirculatory perfusion

Authors

  • F. Vallée hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
  • J. Mateo hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
  • B. Vallet hôpital universitaire de Lille
  • D. Payen hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-011-0222-6

Abstract

The increase in venous to arterial and tissue to arterial PCO2 differences (Pv-aCO2 and Pt-aCO2) is a constant result found in experimental and clinical studies on circulatory failure. The value of these two gradients depends on the tissue perfusion. In patients with cardiovascular failure, an “anaerobic” CO2 production occurs by buffering H+ ions produced in excess; however, this production cannot offset the simultaneous decrease in “aerobic” CO2 production. The increase in venous and tissue CO2 can no longer be explained by an increase in CO2 production but rather by hypoperfusion, with lower CO2 clearance creating an accumulation of CO2 in the tissues and the venous system. In septic shock, the pathophysiology could associate high cardiac output after initial resuscitation and tissue perfusion heterogeneity by alteration of the microcirculation. In this situation, aPv-aCO2 gradient < 6 mmHg (together with a SvO2 > 70%) represents a therapeutic goal to restore the macrocirculation; however, the persistence of a high Pt-aCO2 gradient reflects an abnormality in microcirculation with residual tissue hypoperfusion. All these points are well illustrated in the literature by several experimental and clinical studies, confirming that PCO2 gradients reflect themacro-and microcirculatory perfusion in shock states. As easily measured in blood samples or using less and less invasive monitoring devices, their use should be promoted and popularized for daily clinical practice.

Published

2011-02-16

How to Cite

Vallée, F., Mateo, J., Vallet, B., & Payen, D. (2011). PCO2 gradients: a reliable marker of macro- and microcirculatory perfusion. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 20(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13546-011-0222-6